Liberal-Statist Self-Delusion

An example, taken from today’s Guardian, “Living with diversity”, of more liberal-statist self-delusion:

“. . . neither immigration nor ethnicity is the primary predictor of a lack of social cohesion. Instead, as the most recent research has shown, it is the level of economic deprivation.”

Thus, there is no need to restrict immigration or criticise multi-ethnic society, i.e. to challenge the ideology of the liberal-fascist Left, which is devastating our country and subcontinent.

Response to Madeleine Bunting

Who, in an article, “Labour still haunted by Gillian Duffy”, in today’s Guardian (Cif) claims the following:

“Enoch Powell’s predictions [Rivers of Blood speech] have been proved wrong.”

Like the predictions made around the same time (in the late 60s and early 70s) relating to the “limits to growth”, i.e. the inherent non-sustainability of consumer-capitalism, on our finite, vulnerable and overpopulated planet . . !!

The course of the 21^st Century will reveal such claims to have been tragically premature.

She also writes:

“The debate of the 80s about whether it is possible to be black and British is now seen as absurd.”

Absurd? By whom? By the liberal-fascist/statist left who actually believe in the oxymoronic absurdity of “multi-ethnic nationhood” they have imposed on us since the end of WW2 . . !!

The fact is that ANYONE, without any regard whatsoever to race, ethnic origins or culture, is now considered BRITISH, thereby destroying any claim the British STATE may (or may not) have had to representing a PEOPLE and a NATION.

Sure, you can be “black and British”; you can be “absolutely anything and British” nowaday, thus removing all meaning from the word – except to liberal-statists, of course, who would embrace anyone and anything in their ideological, self-righteous and moral-high-ground-claiming obsession with “inclusiveness”.

Having completely undermined its claim to nationhood – and the legitimacy, authority and loyalty that went with it – all that our mercenary STATE is left with now is POWER, our dependency on it, and our reluctance to face up to reality and disillusionment.

Guardian Advocates Europe’s Islamification

The following is quoted from an article by Timothy Garton Ash in today’s Guardian, "If this is young Arabs’ 1989, Europe must be ready with a bold response":

“As their homelands modernise, young Arabs – and nearly one third of the population of the north African littoral is between the age of 15 and 30 – will circulate across the Mediterranean, contributing to European economies, and to paying the pensions of rapidly ageing European societies.”

I find it hard to imagine that the author, who sometimes expresses quite sensible opinions, really wants to promote the Islamification and de-Europeanisation (globalisation) of Europe, so why is he encouraging it?

Presumably, he naively believes that in Europe, Arabs will become liberal-minded Europeans like himself. No doubt, some will. But as we now know from experience (those of us not blinded by economic interests or liberal-statist ideology), many won’t. Understandably (if you see them ashuman beings rather than just a human resource,to be manipulated and exploited by state and capital), they will remain true to their Islamic roots, and seek to change Europe accordingly.

The Liberal-Fascist Vision for Europe

And anyone daring to oppose it is a RACIST.

The following quotes are take from an article in yesterday’s Guardian (where else?) by Loretta Napoleoni:

Title: “May Europe’s multicultural new generation succeed where we failed”

The new generation of teenagers is the first born inside the united Europe’s multicultural melting pot, one no longer just populated by Europeans.

Multiculturalism may well be our saviour, wresting us out from the straitjacket of our history, thrusting the old continent into an environment where other ethnicities, less cynical and more positive, will play a big role in its future.

The new blood of the children of immigrants both drives transnational protest and cements solidarity among Europe’s young [link to article containing even more brazen liberal-fascist misinformation and ideology].

I wish I were young again to walk that line with you, to share the experience of reshaping a continent. My generation had similar dreams but failed to achieve them.

Will you succeed where we failed? I believe so. Because the socio-cultural paradigm of Europe has finally shifted, and those who rule us today do not represent such a shift [because still so hideously "white"!]. As your generation comes to power, then the political paradigm will inevitably alter.

Europeans will no longer be explorers; they will not adventure across unknown seas to steal others’ treasure, they will not scale the highest mountains to plant flags, nor will they look west or east to decide what to think and how to behave internationally. But they will be able to delve into the new multicultural spirit of a reinvigorated continent for new economic, social and political formulas.

That is the Europe I dream of for you and the one I want to belong to.

It makes for very disturbing reading and if you feel as I remember feeling in the past, your initial reaction will be to push it aside and forget about it, because we know that any objections we raise, unless self-censored to meaninglessness, will immediately be met with accusation of “racism”.

But don’t dismiss it. That is what many people did after reading Hitler’s Mein Kampf, refusing to take seriously his horrific vision for Europe, dominated by a Germanic master race.

The liberal-fascist Left have got their OWN master race in mind: the product of mass non-European immigration and the melting pot thus created. They are as intent on eliminating their own white race of ethnic Europeans as the Nazis were on eliminating the Jews – but, of course, for our own good and that of humanity as a whole (motivated, not by hatred for others, but by self-hate, or perhaps just a pathological lack of love for or identity with their own, which their ideology has misled them into believing is ALL humanity).

And if anyone dares say they don’t want to see their own, white, ethnic European race, eliminated, they are accused of being “racist”, on the ideological grounds that “Race Doesn’t Matter”, or even exist. Suggesting that it does matter, i.e. for a deep and meaningful sense of personal and group (e.g. national) identity (as I do), is considered “racist” – at least, if you are white.

Once the Nazis got to power, no one could oppose their ideology without landing in jail, or worse. Now, having gone from one extreme to the other,liberal-fascists are in power and no one can oppose their ideology without being condemned a “racist”, which isn’t as bad as the threat of jail, but has thus far proved just as effective.

But lets be clear: liberal fascists, thank goodness, are not nearly as bad as Nazi fascists. They mean well, as most communists, socialists, Christian missionaries, etc. did (or still do), but are just misguided. Most, once they realise that, will, I am sure, change their views, just as most communists did, when they realised that the Soviet Union wasn’t, and wasn’t going to become, the utopia they had dreamed of.

Only it’s not just the liberal-fascist Left (represented in the media by the Guardian/Observer, the Independent and the BBC) that are misguided. The conservative right (represented by the Telegraph, Mail, etc.) are misguided too.

In fact, I seem to be the ONLY one who isn’t !At least, not as misguided as most; but still lost, looking for my, my people’s, while not forgetting other people’s, way . . .

There is no such thing as an 'indigenous' Briton

This was the title of an article in Monday's Guardian (Cif), written by two left-wing academics specialising in native (indigenous) American culture.

They write that 

“articles on Comment is free about indigenous peoples [invariably attract comments which ask] “what about the British . . . why can't we be indigenous, [thereby] aligning themselves – surely unwittingly – with the nationalist myth-making of the far right.”

They go on to quote the sociologist and anthropologist Mathias Guenther: 

"Indigenous is a term applied to people – and by the people to themselves – who are engaged in an often desperate struggle for political rights, for land, for a place and space within a modern nation's economy and society."

This is a classic and illuminating example of how the liberal-(fascist) left suppresses all expression of ethnic, i.e. natural and spontaneous national, identity amongst its own, ethnic European, peoples, be we English, French, German, Russian, Poles, Italian, Irish, European Americans, Australians, or whatever. Only ethnic minorities are allowed to have, express and cultivate their own ethnic identities, while for white ethnic majorities the very same feelings and behaviours are condemned and suppressed as “racist”.

Only when indigenous Britons (who represent just a few of Europe's many – more-or-less mixed - indigenous peoples) have become a disadvantage minority themselves (according to current projections, probably, some time during the next century), “engaged in a desperate struggle for political rights, for land, for a place and space within a modern nation's [globalised] economy and society", will we become worthy of state concern for our “indigenous rights”, and of pity from “progressives” and the liberal left. Until then, calling ourselves “indigenous” is just plain “racist”.

People often speak, or write, about “playing the race card”, when in fact it is ALWAYS on the table, with these words written across it in thick letters: Race doesn't matter! i.e. is of no social or political importance, except for ethnic minorities, of course (who must be allowed to peacefully cultivate their own ethnic identities, for the sake of their own self-esteem and the “diversity” that enriches us all), and for evil white “racists”.

It's an insanity (of normality, and thus difficult to clearly recognise and grapple with), of course, but that is the reality we live in, which self-proclaimed “progressives” of the liberal left have succeeded in imposing on us, including conservatives, who are as terrified of the race card as anyone, although they tend not to embrace it with the self-righteous enthusiasm of true believers on the liberal-(fascist) left.

Why is the state (of which the liberal left are the most ardent supporters, ever keen to expand its powers) so concerned to suppress (by equating it with “racism”) all expression and cultivation of white, ethnic European, identity?

It is, I believe, because this represents the stirrings of a natural and spontaneous form of nationalism (the affinity of closely related peoples for each other), which, if allowed to develop, would challenge the state's own (false) claim to nationhood, along with the power that goes with it.