Parliament Has Betrayed Us


This was my response to a comment by tokyonagaremono in the thread below an article in the Telegraph by Norman Tebbit:  A return to capital punishment? Tokyonagareono's post became the most recommended comment and my response to it had more than 100 recommendations before being removed ("flagged for review") by the moderation. Here it is:

Parliament itself has betrayed us, Britain's native peoples, to the madness of mass third world immigration and the ideology of post-racial multiculturalism, but we can't shoot or hang them all, at least, not so long as they continue to control the armed forces. It will be them shooting us!


Because of this betrayal, we are in fact moving towards civil war, as is all western Europe, since I don't think that Europe's native peoples ultimately will allow themselves to become an ethnic minority on their own continent without a fight.


But if we recognise and face up to the betrayal which has taken place, instead of celebrating it, as Parliament currently expects us to do, I'm hopeful that there is still time to resolve the issue peacefully.

What we are dealing with here - the reason it is taking so long to recognise and face up to - is SELF-BETRAYAL. It is the SYSTEM, the STATE, and its IDEOLOGY of post-racial multiculturalism which is betraying us. Anyone wanting to make a career for themselves in politics or the media has no choice but to go along with them.


Renegotiating the Social Contract

The following quote is taken from the blog of Norman Tebbit:

“What we are seeing is a significant failure of the state to observe its side of the social contract between the governors and the governed.”

Funny that you should mention the “social contract ”, Norman, since I’ve been thinking about that a lot lately.

When was this “social contract ” negotiated? And between whom? Personally, I don’t remember ever being consulted. Does anyone else on this blog?

In so far as there was an unwritten “social contract ”, it was based on the assumption that the STATE represented a NATION comprising the native peoples of these British isles. It certainly didn’t mention anything about it also including as many 3rd world immigrants as the STATE, under one pretext or another, chose to let in, with the consequence that within the next 50 short years Britain’s native peoples (referred to as “white British ” in the census) will have become an ethnic minority in their ancestral homeland.

I believe it high time that WE negotiated a NEW “social contract “, one which, among other things, I want to guarantee that Britain’s indigenous peoples remain the ethnic majority on these islands for the foreseeable future.

This new contract is going to take a while to draw up and agree upon, so I suggest the we start discussions and consultations about it immediately.

We're All Gurkhas (mercenaries) Now

Written in response to a post on former chairman of the Conservative Party, Norman Tebbit's blog, at the Telegraph, from which the following quote is taken:

". . . there is a large Muslim population of Asian origins and I would rather seek to integrate that population than push it back into ghettoes."

“Integrate”? Most immigrants came here, Norman, to exploit the massive advantages (social, political, economic) Britain has to offer compared with their countries of origin, thereby reciprocating your party's interest in exploiting their cheap labour: a thoroughly mercenary arrangement.

Understandably, as human beings, rather than the “human-resources” state and capital mainly see them as, they had no intention of selling their souls, i.e. giving up their ethnic (which, if you look up its Greek root, is just another word for “national”) identity in the bargain, although you seem to have assumed they would, creating an American-style melting pot with the indigenous population, I suppose.

Admittedly, your party has been forced to go much further than economic interests alone would have driven you, by Labour's ideological embrace of mass immigration and multi-ethnic society, which they succeeded in elevating to a twisted moral imperative - the only alternative to “racism” and the extreme right; which, of course, it provoked, thereby reinforcing their claim to the “moral high ground” and political power).

When brave Conservatives like Enoch Powell dared question the wisdom of allowing mass immigration into our already, natively and unsustainably, overpopulated country and undermining the ethnic basis of its national identity, they were condemned by the Left as “racists”, and your party leadership, fearful of being called “racists” themselves, joined in the condemnation, making you complicit in taking the NATION out of what was supposed to be a nation state, and leaving in its place just a mercenary state.

We are all Gurkhas (mercenaries) now, which I guess is why there was such a show of sympathy for them recently. So let's end the pretence of being a PEOPLE and a NATION (the Big Society!). It's every man (and his family) for themselves.

I'm thinking of becoming an “American”, which provides even better opportunities, if you have the necessary talents, for exploiting one's human environment (so-called “society”) than being “British” does.